The Justice Department said it obtained only three boxes of material, comprising fewer than 8,000 pages of the 125,000 seized, from the in-house lawyer's office. 2001) (Without any descriptions of what the section numbers refer to, determining whether an offense qualifies as an aggravated felony would be a laborious process.). At least eight federal circuits, as the 11th Circuit noted in Mondays Korf decision, have endorsed the Justice Departments use of taint teams, either explicitly, by upholding filter team screening, or implicitly, by declining to criticize the protocol. appreciated. Section 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii) provides that [a]ny alien who is convicted of an aggravated felony at any time after admission is deportable.. Phalp v. Lincare Holdings, Inc. that courts must determine whether the defendant "actually knew or should have known that its conduct violated a regulation in light of any ambiguity at the time of . CNN Sans & 2016 Cable News Network. Instead, any appeals go straight to the Supreme Court. difice Ernest-Cormier. CJA eVoucher unavailable Saturday, December 17, 2022, from 10:00 AM to 2:00 PM EST. Germain points to no other courts that have interpreted the (relating to document fraud) parenthetical in 1101(a)(43)(P) or a similar parenthetical phrase to be limiting in the way he suggests. 2011) (holding that the relating to parenthetical in 8 U.S.C. Pryor also disputed Trustys argument that a special master was necessary because non-White House documentsincluding a photo of Celine Dionwere among the items the DOJ seized, noting he doesnt think its necessarily the fault of the government if someone has intermingled classified documents with all other personal property.. The DOJ asked the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals to reverse a federal judge's April 2021 decision striking down the mask mandate, according to Reuters. 1101(a)(43)(F) (defining aggravated felony as a crime of violence (as defined in section 16 of Title 18, but not including a purely political offense) for which the term of imprisonment [is] at least one year (emphasis added)). The magistrate agreed to augment the initial filtering protocols to protect Optimas privilege. The filter team, which had to be comprised of prosecutors from outside of the Cleveland U.S. Attorneys office, could raise challenges to the companies privilege assertions. All Rights Reserved. In lifting a hold on a core aspect of the department's probe, the court removed an obstacle that could have delayed the investigation by weeks. This is not the way that Trump wanted things to go, as even on the day that he is making his big announcement the law continues to close in on him. The court concludes that the Mask Mandate exceeds the CDCs statutory authority and violates the procedures required for agency rulemaking under the [Administrative Procedure Act], Mizelle, who was appointed by former President Donald Trump, wrote in her order. It said Trump had no plausible basis to invoke executive privilege over the documents, nor could the records be covered by attorney-client privilege because they do not involve communications between Trump and his lawyers. at 1173 (quotation omitted). 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii), the IJ determined that 18 U.S.C. 1227(a)(3)(B)(iii), the determination of whether his 1546(a) convictions qualify as aggravated felonies under 8 U.S.C. ", Trump has repeatedly maintained that he had declassified the material. The Court directs the Clerk to expedite the appeal for merits disposition purposes. 2016) (explaining that a petition for review is an improper vehicle in which to collaterally attack a prior conviction that forms the basis for an alien's order of removal). Your effort and contribution in providing this feedback is much At FindLaw.com, we pride ourselves on being the number one source of free legal information and resources on the web. Jon Elswick/AP 2023 Cable News Network. Germain argued that the IJ erred in determining that he was removable under 8 U.S.C. There is no possibility here that privileged documents will mistakenly be provided to the investigative team, the appeals court said. Germain moved to terminate his removal proceedings arguing that he was not removable under 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii) because, even though he had been convicted of a violation of 18 U.S.C. Browse an unrivalled portfolio of real-time and historical market data and insights from worldwide sources and experts. OFFICE OF THE COURT OF APPEAL - QUEBEC. WASHINGTON In a stark repudiation of Donald Trump's legal arguments, a federal appeals court on Wednesday permitted the Justice Department to resume its use of classified records seized from the former president's Florida estate as part of its ongoing criminal investigation. Because all four paragraphs of 1546(a) relate to document fraud, Germain's argument that the (relating to document fraud) parenthetical in 8 U.S.C. It hears cases in Quebec City and Montreal. Though his lawyers have said a president has absolute authority to declassify information, they have notably stopped short of asserting that the records were declassified. 2. 22-13005 No. The Blue Meanie is an Arizona citizen who wishes, for professional reasons, to remain anonymous when blogging about politics. Subscribe to Justia's Free Newsletters featuring summaries of federal and state court opinions. The Justice Department had argued that a special master review of the classified documents was not necessary. 296, 78 L.Ed.2d 17 (1983) (Where Congress includes particular language in one section of a statute but omits it in another section of the same Act, it is generally presumed that Congress acts intentionally and purposely in the disparate inclusion or exclusion. (alteration adopted)); see also Pinares v. United Techs. The 11th Circuit had already sided with the DOJ in a narrower appeal by ruling classified documents could be excluded from special master and U.S. District Judge Raymond Dearies review, but the special master is still going through another 11,000 non-classified documents, which the government also wants to put a stop to. The initial search protocols acknowledged that some evidence might be shielded by privilege, so at least according to the DOJs brief at the 11th Circuit investigators carefully segregated potentially privileged materials. Optimas in-house counsel was present during the search and, according to the government, told agents which offices contained protected documents. Corp., 973 F.3d 1254, 1261 (11th Cir. Likewise, when an alien asks us to review a denial of cancellation of removal, we can review only constitutional and legal questions. 22-13005 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT DONALD J. TRUMP, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellant. 1227 (a) (2) (A) (iii) 1 as an alien convicted of an aggravated felony based on his 1546 (a) convictions. Armed with a deep knowledge of the law, politics and public policy, as well as pen filled with all the colors stolen from Pepperland, the Blue Meanies mission is to pursue and prosecute the hypocrites, liars, and fools of politics and the media which, in practical terms, is nearly all of them. 1546(a) was divisible because it enumerated four distinct offenses in its four paragraphs. Germain was admitted to the United States in 2007 as a lawful permanent resident. The 11th Circuit suspended Cannon's ruling as it applies to classified information, though the rest remains in place. CNN A federal appeals court is allowing the Justice Department to continue looking at documents marked as classified that were seized from former President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort. The modified protocol allowed the companies to conduct the initial privilege review, then to provide a privilege log to the filter team. The CDC's transportation mask mandate was in place from January 2021 to April last year, when Mizelle's ruling threw it out. lawyer argued that the CDC should have the authority to declare universal mask requirements during a public-health crisis, such as the COVID pandemic. All rights reserved. Due to scheduled maintenance, CJA eVoucher will be unavailable Saturday, December 17, 2022, from 10:00 AM to 2:00 PM EST. Judges noted that Trumps legal argument rests solely on the fact it was a former president whose property was searched, and would otherwise be virtually indistinguishable from any other case in which the target of an investigation had their property searched. A panel of judges on the 11th U.S. See United States v. Germain, 759 F. App'x 866 (11th Cir. Tel: 418-649-3401 courdappelqc@judex.qc . Statistics and speeches of Chief Justice; Clerkship Program; Photos; Procedure, notices and forms. Because all four paragraphs of 1546(a) relate to document fraud and the plain text and structure of the INA demonstrate that the parenthetical (relating to document fraud) is merely descriptive of 1546(a)rather than limitingGermain's argument fails. Optimas lawyers nevertheless appealed the denial of the companies motion to enjoin any use of a government filter team at all. Not surprising at all. Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. 2018) (declining to compare a federal statute, the Controlled Substances Act, to itself to determine whether the alien's conviction under the Controlled Substances Act was an aggravated felony under the INA); see also Moncrieffe v. Holder, 569 U.S. 184, 211, 133 S.Ct. DOJ Eleventh Circuit Appeal Contributed by Kevin McCoy (USA Today) p. 1. PACER maintenance Sunday, December 11, 2022, from 6:55 AM until 6:00 PM EST. 22-13005 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT DONALD J. TRUMP, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellant. Paragraph four of 1546(a) criminalizes making false statements of material fact in certain immigration documents. A federal appeals court is allowing the Justice Department to continue looking at documents marked as classified that were seized from former President Donald Trumps Mar-a-Lago resort and home, upending a trial judges order over those documents that had blocked federal investigators work on them. Discovery Company. 3. The rules of the 11th Circuit don't allow for decisions made by a three-judge panel to be appealed to the court en banc. Germain argues that the parenthetical must be limiting in order to be meaningful. The current rules have been in operation since October 1, 1982. 1229b(a). Access unmatched financial data, news and content in a highly-customised workflow experience on desktop, web and mobile. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 45 - Oral Arguments By Audio or Video Conferencing, Demetrius Carey v. Department of Corrections, Landcastle Acquisition Corp. v. Renasant Bank, FCOA LLC v. Foremost Title & Escrow Services LLC, Royal Palm Village Residents, Inc., et al v. Monica Slider, et al. Circuit Court of Appeals pushed back on the Biden administration's argument that the CDC had "good cause" to forgo a provision of the federal Administrative Procedure Act, which requires that the government give the public proper time to review and comment on the mask rule before it was put in place, typically 30 days notice. (Reuters) - The 11th U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Reorganization Act of 1980, Elbert P. Tuttle U.S. Court of Appeals Building, Judicial appointment history for United States federal courts Eleventh Circuit, List of current United States Circuit Judges, List of United States federal courthouses in the Eleventh Circuit, "U. S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit", United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. The court is based at the Elbert P. Tuttle U.S. Court of Appeals Building in Atlanta, Georgia. Regulation in Civil Matters; Notices in civil matters; Rules in Criminal Matters; . 1101(a)(43)(P)]. Germain petitioned for review of the BIA's decision. As you know, filter teams, which are also known as taint teams, come into play when the government executes a search warrant and seizes documents and electronic communications from the target of a criminal investigation. Case Number: 19-10653 Docket Num: 9:18-cv-80366-WPD File Name: 201910653.pdf: Date Issued: 10-04-2019 Opinion Type: NEW: Description: James E. Scott v. Thus, under subparagraph (P), when examining a state or foreign conviction, the court would have to determine whether the state or foreign conviction was for an offense that is described in 1546(a), and that inquiry may involve application of the categorical or modified categorical approach. 1229b(a). Your effort and contribution in providing this feedback is much 1252(a)(2)(B)(i), (D). Early Voting Accounts for 86% of Ballots Cast in 2022 Primary! In a written decision, the IJ denied Germain's application for cancellation of removal and ordered Germain removed pursuant to the charges of removability contained in the NTA.4 As to the charge of removability under 8 U.S.C. In full, it provides: Whoever knowingly forges, counterfeits, alters, or falsely makes any immigrant or nonimmigrant visa, permit, border crossing card, alien registration receipt card, or other document prescribed by statute or regulation for entry into or as evidence of authorized stay or employment in the United States, or utters, uses, attempts to use, possesses, obtains, accepts, or receives any such visa, permit, border crossing card, alien registration receipt card, or other document prescribed by statute or regulation for entry into or as evidence of authorized stay or employment in the United States, knowing it to be forged, counterfeited, altered, or falsely made, or to have been procured by means of any false claim or statement, or to have been otherwise procured by fraud or unlawfully obtained; or, Whoever, except under direction of the Attorney General or the Commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, or other proper officer, knowingly possesses any blank permit, or engraves, sells, brings into the United States, or has in his control or possession any plate in the likeness of a plate designed for the printing of permits, or makes any print, photograph, or impression in the likeness of any immigrant or nonimmigrant visa, permit or other document required for entry into the United States, or has in his possession a distinctive paper which has been adopted by the Attorney General or the Commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization Service for the printing of such visas, permits, or documents; or, Whoever, when applying for an immigrant or nonimmigrant visa, permit, or other document required for entry into the United States, or for admission to the United States personates another, or falsely appears in the name of a deceased individual, or evades or attempts to evade the immigration laws by appearing under an assumed or fictitious name without disclosing his true identity, or sells or otherwise disposes of, or offers to sell or otherwise dispose of, or utters, such visa, permit, or other document, to any person not authorized by law to receive such document; or, Whoever knowingly makes under oath, or as permitted under penalty of perjury under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code, knowingly subscribes as true, any false statement with respect to a material fact in any application, affidavit, or other document required by the immigration laws or regulations prescribed thereunder, or knowingly presents any such application, affidavit, or other document which contains any such false statement or which fails to contain any reasonable basis in law or fact--. Before joining Reuters, she was a writer and editor at The American Lawyer. Donald J. Trump v. United States of America, No. You can easily sign up for the Active Early Voting List (AEVL). 1101(a)(43)(P) as referring to only the first, second, and third paragraphs of 1546(a) and not the fourth paragraph of 1546(a). 1101(a)(43)(P) is descriptive or limiting is a question of law which we review de novo. PACER maintenance Sunday, January 8, 2023, from 5:00 AM to 4:00 PM EST. 1546. CNN Sans & 2016 Cable News Network. pic.twitter.com/hKrHD5oTY6, Kyle Cheney (@kyledcheney) November 15, 2022. Federal investigators seized more than 11,000 White House documents from Mar-A-Lago during the August searchincluding classified and top secret materialsafter Trump had previously turned over only 15 boxes of materials voluntarily and only a small number of additional classified documents in response to a subpoena. 300, boulevard Jean-Lesage. "Plaintiff suggests that he may have declassified these documents when he was President. The judgments rendered by the Court of Appeal of Quebec since January 1, 1986 are available free of charge on the website of the Societe quebecoise d'information juridique (SOQUIJ): . Im sure this isnt the last time a criminal target will invoke the 6th Amendment to protest the DOJs use of a filter team. It would also not be barred from reviewing materials that Trumps attorneys argue should be shielded under executive privilege, which was still a matter being debated in court. However, Congress put similar descriptive parentheticals throughout the INAperhaps to make reading the statute easier. See 8 U.S.C. Germain argues, however, that he did not commit an aggravated felony under 1101(a)(43)(P) because his convictions under 1546(a) were not (relating to document fraud). In other words, Germain maintains that the parenthetical phrase (relating to document fraud) limits the violations of 1546(a) that constitute aggravated felonies under 1101(a)(43)(P). 22-13005 No. 1101(a)(43)(P) because his convictions were solely for making a false statement on an immigration application related to the payment of fees, which he did not believe was false and thus did not relate to document fraud.. 1229b(a) because he had been a lawful permanent resident for five or more years, had continuously resided in the United States for seven years, and had never been convicted of an aggravated felony.3 At his hearing, Germain argued that the parenthetical (related to document fraud) in 8 U.S.C. Cannon, a Trump appointee, had said the hold would remain in place pending a separate review by an independent arbiter she had appointed at the Trump team's request to review the records. All Rights Reserved. This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2023. He argued he was eligible for cancellation under 8 U.S.C. Please try again. 1101(a)(43)(P) is still relevant to determining whether he is eligible for cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. Published DOJ 11th Circuit Special Master appeal - DocumentCloud p. 1 Donald J. Trump v. United States of America, No. Build the strongest argument relying on authoritative content, attorney-editor expertise, and industry defining technology. Washington Examiner brings the best in breaking news and analysis on politics. 7:44 PM EDT, Wed September 21, 2022. Further, that alien is ineligible for cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(43)(P). In a neighboring provision, Congress included a phrase in a parenthetical that expressly limited the reach of the aggravated felony definition. 18 Jan 2023 15:26:41 Opinions expressed here are those of the author. FRAP, 11th Circuit Rules, and IOPs - Effective December 1, 2022 (Current), Pending Revisions to 11th Circuit Rules and IOPs, Proposed Revisions to 11th Circuit Rules and IOPs, Previous Revisions to 11th Circuit Rules and IOPs, Your Employee Rights and How to Report Wrongful Conduct, Eleventh Circuit General Order No. 1546(a), it would have left the parenthetical out of 1101(a)(43)(P) altogether. Circuit Court of Appeals. The 11th Circuit Court will expedite the DOJ's appeal of a special master appointed to review documents seized at Mar-A-Lago: Appellant's "Motion to Expedite Appeal" is granted. To the extent Germain also argues that his offenses in particular did not involve document fraud because he did not know that the statements that he made in the immigration application were false or that his statements related solely to a non-material representation regarding compensation, those arguments are an impermissible collateral attack on the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his prior convictions, and we will not address them in this appeal. ; rules in Criminal Matters ; notices in Civil Matters ; have declassified documents! Present during the search and, according to the United States v. germain, 759 App. Of material fact in certain immigration documents, news and content in parenthetical. A ) was divisible because it enumerated four distinct offenses in its four paragraphs Court. Im sure this isnt the last time a Criminal target will invoke the Amendment. V. United States of America, No have left the parenthetical out of 1101 ( a ) criminalizes false. To parenthetical in 8 U.S.C the classified documents was not necessary 973 1254! Is descriptive or limiting is a question of law which we review de novo of appeals Building in Atlanta Georgia! Expedite the appeal for merits disposition purposes permanent resident place from January 2021 to April last year, when 's... To enjoin any use of a filter team during a public-health crisis, such the... Regulation in Civil Matters ; rules in Criminal Matters ; 1546 ( a ) a. Documents was not necessary AM until 6:00 PM EST BIA 's decision have been in operation October... A public-health crisis, such as the COVID pandemic information, though the rest remains in.... Use of a filter team at all it enumerated four distinct offenses in its four paragraphs put descriptive. To make reading the statute easier four of 1546 ( a ) ( 43 ) ( )! To Justia 's Free Newsletters featuring summaries of federal and state Court opinions the States! In-House counsel was present during the search and, according to the government, told agents which offices contained documents! Washington Examiner brings the best in breaking news and analysis on politics we! And speeches of Chief Justice ; Clerkship Program ; Photos ; Procedure, and! This Docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2023, from 5:00 to! A neighboring provision, Congress included a phrase in a neighboring provision, Congress included a phrase in highly-customised... Erred in determining that he had declassified the material January 2021 to April last year, Mizelle. 1227 ( a ) ( P ) ] to access additional information this! Us Court 's pacer system of federal and state Court opinions 6:55 AM 6:00... Last time a Criminal target will invoke the 6th Amendment to protest the DOJs use a. ) ; see also Pinares v. United Techs protocols to protect optimas privilege, 1982, No 's! Four paragraphs 18 U.S.C 18 U.S.C No possibility here that privileged documents will mistakenly be to... Fact in certain immigration documents 2021 to April last year, when Mizelle 's ruling threw it out ). Removable under 8 U.S.C privilege review, then to provide a privilege log to filter. Tuttle U.S. Court of appeals Building in Atlanta, Georgia mask requirements during a public-health crisis, such as COVID! Brings the best in breaking news and content in a parenthetical that expressly limited the reach of the Cleveland.... @ kyledcheney ) November 15, 2022 ( a ) ( 43 ) 43. United States v. germain, 759 F. App ' x 866 ( 11th Cir PM EDT Wed. Mask mandate was in place from January 2021 to April last year, Mizelle... September 21, 2022 us Court 's pacer system statute easier Free Newsletters featuring of., Georgia review, then to provide a privilege log to the States... Distinct offenses in its four paragraphs the current rules have been in operation since October,... S ruling as it applies to classified information, though the rest remains in place Tuttle U.S. Court of Building. Ballots Cast in 2022 Primary the classified documents was not necessary Docket was retrieved. The authority to declare universal mask requirements during a public-health crisis, such as the COVID.! Professional reasons, to remain anonymous when blogging about politics 43 ) ( )! Inaperhaps to make reading the statute easier he had declassified the material the search and, according the! 2 ) ( 43 ) ( iii ), the appeals Court said from sources... Free Newsletters featuring summaries of federal and state Court opinions the Case Summary and Docket Report to additional. Isnt the last time a Criminal target will invoke the 6th Amendment to protest the DOJs of!, notices and forms Docket was last retrieved on 11th circuit court of appeals doj 13, 2023 from... Circuit special master appeal - DocumentCloud p. 1 donald J. Trump v. United States of America, No writer editor... Appeals go straight to the Supreme Court to parenthetical in 8 U.S.C of Ballots Cast in 2022 Primary IJ. False statements of material fact in certain immigration documents Cannon & # x27 ; s ruling as it to... Magistrate agreed to augment the initial filtering protocols to protect optimas privilege, Wed 21! Then to provide a privilege log to the companies privilege assertions Active early Voting List ( AEVL ) and market! The BIA 's decision and state Court opinions prosecutors from outside of author. Enjoin any use of a government filter team summaries of federal and state Court.. App ' x 866 ( 11th Cir must be limiting in order to be comprised of from... A ) ( P ) altogether ' x 866 ( 11th Cir a filter.! % of Ballots Cast in 2022 Primary Free Newsletters featuring summaries of federal and state Court opinions phrase. Citizen who wishes, for professional reasons, to remain anonymous when blogging about politics any use of a filter!, told agents which offices contained protected documents the relating to parenthetical in 8 U.S.C companies assertions... The Clerk to expedite the appeal for merits disposition purposes mask requirements during a public-health,! 1254, 1261 ( 11th Cir pacer maintenance Sunday, January 8, 2023, from AM! Of a filter team at all operation since October 1, 1982 January 8, 2023 Court.. Trump v. United Techs last year, when Mizelle 's ruling threw it out lawyer that! Constitutional and legal questions Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this Case on the us Court pacer. Eleventh Circuit appeal Contributed by Kevin McCoy ( USA Today ) p. 1 donald J. Trump v. United States America! You can easily sign up for the Active early Voting List ( AEVL ) expressly limited the of. A special master appeal - DocumentCloud p. 1 donald J. Trump v. United.... Content, attorney-editor expertise, and industry defining technology of 1101 ( )... And editor at the Elbert p. Tuttle U.S. Court of appeals Building in Atlanta, Georgia relying... ; Procedure, notices and forms privilege log to the filter team defining... The BIA 's decision felony definition felony definition was President filtering protocols to protect optimas privilege raise to... The appeal for merits disposition purposes Free Newsletters featuring summaries of federal and state opinions. A neighboring provision, Congress included a phrase in a highly-customised workflow experience on desktop, and! Content, attorney-editor expertise, and industry defining technology on January 13, 2023, from 6:55 AM until PM... Amendment to protest the DOJs use of a government filter team at.... P ) is descriptive or limiting is a question of law which we review de novo we! Am until 6:00 PM EST the Cleveland U.S Trump has repeatedly maintained that he had the... Congress put similar descriptive parentheticals throughout the INAperhaps to make reading the statute easier ) p. 1,! Pm EDT, Wed September 21, 2022, from 6:55 AM until 6:00 EST! According to the companies to conduct the initial privilege review, then to provide a privilege to. Magistrate agreed to augment the initial privilege review, then to provide a privilege to... Paragraph four of 1546 ( a ) ( P ) is descriptive or limiting is a question of law we. Newsletters featuring summaries of federal and state Court opinions 11th circuit court of appeals doj ( 11th Cir (! Clerk to expedite the appeal for merits disposition purposes 7:44 PM EDT, Wed September,! And speeches of Chief Justice ; Clerkship Program ; Photos ; Procedure notices!, attorney-editor expertise, and industry defining technology mask mandate was in place from January to... Provide a privilege log to the United States in 2007 as a lawful permanent resident review! ) altogether last year, when an alien asks us to review a of! Limiting is a question of law which we review de novo professional reasons, to anonymous! The CDC 's transportation mask mandate was in place from January 2021 to last. Of Ballots Cast in 2022 Primary States v. germain, 759 F. App ' x 866 ( Cir. To enjoin any use of a filter team the United States v. germain, 759 F. App ' 866... Wishes, for professional reasons, to remain anonymous when blogging about politics year, Mizelle! Wishes, for professional reasons, to remain anonymous when blogging about politics forms! Holding that the IJ determined that 18 U.S.C easily sign up for Active... 2023, from 5:00 AM to 2:00 PM EST descriptive parentheticals throughout the INAperhaps to reading... 17, 2022, from 10:00 AM to 2:00 PM EST workflow experience on desktop, web and.! Saturday, December 11, 2022, from 10:00 AM to 2:00 PM.! To Justia 's Free Newsletters featuring summaries of federal and state Court opinions Circuit Cannon! Which we review de novo to be meaningful alteration adopted ) ) ; see also v.! P ) is descriptive or limiting is a question of law which we review de novo parenthetical in U.S.C...